Now that the Trump administration’s highly anticipated new tax legislation is airing out, some living in high-tax states such as California, New Jersey or New York are probably weighing the pros and cons of staying put or pulling up stakes and retiring to lower-tax states, like Florida or Texas.
I am actually seeing plenty of examples coming out of California, where I have a financial advisory practice. The Golden State serves as the perfect backdrop for this issue since it’s also the highest-taxed state in the country.
We’ve been at this for a while. For 25 years I have seen clients leave the state for tax-related reasons. Once you’ve counted the beans and weighed the cost-to-benefit, it’s important to note that leaving comes with unforeseen kickbacks, both negative and positive.
First off, I get it: Anyone dealing with sticker shock in light of the potential local, state and property taxes they face under the new laws could be tempted to jump ship and make tracks for so-called “tax-free” states. But there is still a price to pay. To that point, there are a few things I’d tell my clients to consider when we are discussing the option to leave the state.
The new tax law affects people because of the limitations it places on deductions they can make on their state and local income and property taxes. If your finances aren’t greatly impacted by the changes, they might serve as a mere annoyance, but that is only one potential scenario out of many. If a look at the numbers has you flinching and ready to call the movers, it’s time to settle down and weigh the pros and cons.
More from Advisor Insight:
Would you pay ‘back taxes’ with iTunes gift cards?
High time Gen X took retirement planning seriously
What you need to earn to buy a home in top cities
The first thing I suggest is a calculation of what it actually costs to live in the current state, with an emphasis on the taxes being paid out.
For example, imagine that you live in California and make $100,000 in income, but you are paying $7,000 of that in taxes to live in the state. Meanwhile, in Nevada, it’s costing nothing for people making the same amount of money to live the next state over. Infuriating? Possibly. But here’s the thing: For a retired investor, or someone staring down retirement any minute, the stakes are even higher because the reliable income stream is limited. And no one wants to watch their money dwindle due to avoidable expenses.
For most, the ultimate objective is not to merely accumulate as much money and as many assets as they can. Rather, their ideal financial picture includes having enough to be able to spend their time and money as they so choose.
This is different for everyone, but if you are grandparents living in the same state as your family, the decision to move across the country for a tax break could shake out to mean a loss of being more available for quality time. The same goes for friendships and community involvement. Jetting from the place where you have put down roots and are established might be a great adventure … or, it might make you woebegone and wistful for what is, well, gone.
If you’re feeling ready to hit the road, one option I suggest is that, instead of packing up and heading out for good, you put the relocation place “on trial.” This could manifest itself in several different ways, but a key point is to rent out rather than sell the high-tax state property and buy a place in a lower-tax place outright, and give it a year first.
Believe it or not, if you’re used to the lifestyle being based in California provides, relocating to Texas, even if it’s to a golf course community in Texas, will take some adjustment. And, it’s entirely possible that you won’t like it.
Be the first to comment